No policy is perfect!
As such every effort must be made to review and amend policies as necessary based on changing dynamics, internally and externally. Enabling policies have been proven to incentivise desired outcomes, whether social or economic.
It stands to reason therefore that the small business sector was projected to benefit from the National Policy Framework for the Development of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (MSMEs). This body of work, which was the first of its kind for the sector, portended to represent the key interventions needed to pivot MSMEs to contribute greater to employment generation, gross domestic product (GDP), exports, the enfranchisement of vulnerable groups and the overall quality of life of Barbadians. A national strategic plan was intended to follow this framework with the appropriate key performance indicators.
First advocated by John Watson, founding president of the Small Business Association of Barbados (SBA), via a private member’s resolution as an Independent Senator in Parliament in the 2013 term, it was recognised that a comprehensive policy framework was needed to facilitate the growth of MSMEs.
The policy regime was the work of several key stakeholders in the small business sector who came together under the leadership of the then Ministry of Small Business and chaired by the SBA, to examine the needs of the sector and an appropriate set of policies that can contribute to the sector’s growth. Never before had these key agencies coalesced around a common objective and worked toward the completion of a shared goal. The CARICOM’s (Caribbean Community) draft model policy served as a source document since member states of the Community were encouraged to use the document to adapt to their respective markets. Jamaica and Belize had already introduced their regimes, but none existed for Barbados.
It is for this reason that some consternation is being expressed among MSME administrators that small business development programming appears to lack cohesion, clarity and strategic thought. Applying the rubric of SMART objectives, there is a clear void in the approach to MSME programmatic interventions. The goal of using technology to capture data seamlessly across agencies and to inform research & analysis to influence further policy development is nonexistent. The framework to transition the informal sector to the formal economy is unpursued. A diversified financial market offering a range of financial products is underdeveloped, and further incentives to increase exports and bring domestic firms to standardisation are limping along sluggishly. This list is not exhaustive but represents some of the key deliverables discussed by sector leaders for which the policy framework contemplated.
The 2017 policy regime focused on four broad areas designed to work in tandem towards the overall vision “to be a globally competitive, technologically driven MSME sector, contributing to the sustainable socio-economic development of Barbados.”
The four broad thematic pillars were:
- Legislative, regulatory and business development framework
- Access to finance
- Market access, competitiveness and productivity, and
- Development of entrepreneurial skills, knowledge and competencies through education and training.
A brief review of realities on the ground reveals a growing informal sector as the self-employed appear disinterested in the formal systems that administer the sector. This must be curtailed. The policy envisioned that the informal community can be incentivised and brought into the formal economy, thus providing opportunity for quantitative and qualitative assessment of the sector and ensuring that businesses were able to grow while accessing needed resources. While it’s a truism that there will always be those not captured in the public accounts data, the vision of the Government should be to keep this number at a minimum.
Admittedly, there have been existential shocks and changes to the business environment that have impacted the approach to business development. Since 2017 the country has experienced several natural disasters, the world was engulfed in a global pandemic and countries continue to battle issues of climate change and supply chain disruptions. These have all contributed to the need for relevant responses to business development that are reflective of the current specificities of doing business. While strategic conversations are needed on how to adapt to these challenges, there cannot be a disregard to proven methodologies and frameworks – drawing on the proverbial saying, you must not throw out the baby with the bath water.
Policymakers are encouraged to revisit a policy regime for the sector. Having fought for so long to be given pride of place at the ministerial level, the small business sector could least afford to be tossed to the sidelines at this critical time of national development.
Stakeholders will recall when the business ministerial portfolios changed from the traditional industry and commerce, to incorporate small business with the Ministry of Industry, Small Business and Rural Development circa 2012, and the several iterations that followed since. It was this strategic ministry focus that spurred the recognition of the sector’s contribution to the local economy and the resultant support from the international donor community. One significant project that attracted donor funding was the national research on the MSME sector in 2016. This research project provided critical information on the sector’s contribution to employment, GDP, exports and several other variables. The first of its kind in Barbados, this body of information has since been referenced by policymakers, academics, business administrators, and the like.
Now is not the time therefore for a weakening of the focus on small business. Every effort is needed to ensure a credible policy regime is in place to galvanise all stakeholders to work cohesively towards the desired goals and objectives of the country. MSMEs have contributed significantly to our development to date.
